You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I was reading your comments and that was what I was yelling 3 years ago (LOL). So u decide to diss our foreign policies. Yeah we are pretty fucked up bro. Like I said, we do give Israel too much aid when they keep pushing the Palestinians further and further back. I didn't disrespect the Palestinians by saying they could use all the help they could get. What I mean is that Israel has a very powerful military. The only time this country gives aid to others is when we see that we can profit somehow off of exploiting it later. I am not a full blown socialist but I do tend to lean to the left a whole lot more than you think. Listen man, I understand your real passionate about the stuff you talk about, but lets try to serve our communities the best way we can. If I had the $ and power to help the Palestinians I would, but thats just the way it is. I will do what I have the power to do and wish you nothing but the best.
uhhh it's really disgusting to watching your arrogance and hatred consume you to the point you ignore facts. Hitler used propaganda thay says he is a Christian because he lived in a largely christian country however all documentaries and studies on it done by official unbiased people have stated without a doubt that he was no in way a CHRISTIAN. He might have believed in a cult religion where he was messiah(I Personally believe this one since he seems to see himself as working for god although some of his private conversations might suggest otherwise) or he might have been a atheist they aren't sure of that. However in no way was he a Christian. You use propaganda directly from his mouth that he spoke to crowds of CHRISTIANS as evidence that he was a Christian. He was a great speaker and managed to sway crowds by saying what they wanted to hear however all evidence in his personal life leads historians to believe he was without a doubt not a christian.
Genius,are you trying to convince me that the Pope couldn't have been a christian since he sold cyanide gas to help kill the Jews?
Now about Stalin. I am not even going to hold the punches on this one. You have to be the dumbest SOB in the entire world to believe STALIN was a Orthodox Christian. I can't even find a site that backs your belief that Stalin was a Christian that is how absurd it is. I managed to find a site saying the Roman Empire was built by black people yet can't find ONE site that says Stalin was a Orthodox Christian(yes sites say he was born into a Orthodox Christian family but never says he believed the religion as a leader of Soviet Union it actually considers Communism and/or Atheism to be his religion)
At ten, he began attending church school where the Georgian children were forced to speak Russian. By age twelve, two horse-drawn carriage accidents left his left arm permanently damaged. At sixteen, he received a scholarship to a Georgian Orthodox seminary, where he rebelled against the imperialist and religious order. Though he performed well, he was expelled in 1899 after missing his final exams. The seminary's records suggest he was unable to pay his tuition fees."
*psst*
Common sense would tell you that in order to rise within the Communist Party he would've had to declare himself Atheist at one point.Personally I believe Trotsky should've take the spot as he oppossed pretty much everything Stalin stood for including the peace aggreements with his Christian brother Hitler.
Rise to power
Lenin, who disliked Stalin's policy towards Georgia,[7] suffered a stroke in 1922, forcing him into semi-retirement in Gorki. Stalin visited him often, acting as his intermediary with the outside world.[7] The pair quarreled and their relationship deteriorated.[7] Lenin dictated increasingly disparaging notes on Stalin in what would become his testament. He criticized Stalin's rude manners, excessive power, ambition and politics, and suggested that Stalin should be removed from the position of General Secretary.[7] During Lenin's semi-retirement, Stalin forged an alliance with Kamenev and Grigory Zinoviev against Trotsky. These allies prevented Lenin's Testament from being revealed to the Twelfth Party Congress in April 1923.[7]
The murder of Native Americans in USA is no where near the level of Stalin, Hitler, and Mao. You make yourself look like a fool for even suggesting it and make all the Native Americans deaths look hollow when using it to try to push your point when their is no way to know the numbers come even close to that. Nothing I have read put the fighting between colonist and Native American deaths at that high of a number. Besides you make it sound like it was completely one sided. Their were a great many Native American tribes who attacked colonist. For the most part it was a two sided conflict. However two points must be made one being that the Native Americans were here first and second being that some tribes tried to get along with colonist and colonist still backstabbed them. However the majority of the deaths were not one sided massacres so I don't see how comparing it to the what Stalin, Hitler, and Mao did to be at all fair. Yes atrocities probably did happen by BOTH sides the colonist and the Native Americans but is it comparable to the millions of innocent defenseless people that Hitler, Stalin, and Mao murdered no.
Stalin killed around 20 million
Hilter killed around 11 million
That ain't shit compared to what the Christians did on the Western Hemisphere.Try picking up a book sometime..I recommend this one:American Holocaust
***
Just twenty-one days after the first atomic test in the desert, the Japanese industrial city of Hiroshima was leveled by nuclear blast; never before had so many people-at least 130,000, probably many more-died from a single explosion. Just twenty-one years after Columbus's first landing in the Caribbean, the vastly populous island that the explorer had re-named Hispaniola was effectively desolate; nearly 8,000,000 people-those Columbus chose to call Indians-had been killed by violence, disease, and despair. It took a little longer, about the span of a single human generation, but what happened on Hispaniola was the equivalent of more than fifty Hiroshimas. And Hispaniola was only the beginning.
p146
... between 95 and 98 percent of California's Indians had been exterminated in little more than a century. And even this ghastly numerical calculation is inadequate, not only because it reveals nothing of the hideous suffering endured by those hundreds of thousands of California native peoples, but because it is based on decline only from the estimated population for the year 1769-a population that already had been reduced savagely by earlier invasions of European plague and violence. Nationwide by this time only about one-third of one percent of America's population-250,000 out of 76, 000,000 people-were natives. The worst human holocaust the world had ever witnessed, roaring across two continents non-stop for four centuries and consuming the lives of countless tens of millions of people, finally had leveled off. There was, at last, almost no one left to kill.
I feel that there are two types of people that generally will vote Obama, if he does in fact become the presidential nominee for the Democrat Party: (1) Indoctrinated left wing liberal types, and (2) American negros.
The former, has never lived around negroes. White left wing types tend to come from a middle class to upper-middle-class upbringing. Their only exposure, to a negro maybe, an associate professor. Thus, they assume that most negroes behave like the professor in question. Which leads the liberal type to arrive at ridiculous conclusions such that, negroes are being suppressed because of their skin color.
The latter, type of voter is your average everyday negro: Marble mouthing, lazy, loud, disrespectful, know-nothing individual. These are the type of people that have everything handed to them. Traditionally they blame all their problems on whites, and recently they blame all their problems on us(Mexicans).
We as Mexicans need to look out for our own racial interest. I feel that Obama and his followers are at the opposite end of Mexican well-being. Left wing liberals have never truly grasped negro behavior in the theoretical sense. They will never undergo the qualitative reality of living in a negro neighborhood. The liberal type will always be an apologist for degenerate negro behavior. Regardless of the harm negroes may do to us as a group, we can expect no help from liberals, and only expect increased harm.
As of today, there is increased federal involvement in Southern California, where young Mexicans are being charged by the Federal Government under civil rights statutes. The hypocrisy in this, is that negroes initiated the violence. With un-documented immigrants, negroes had their way . Now that we are starting to organize and gather power, negroes are starting to use their clout at the federal level . Now, imagine if negroes had one of their own in the white house. Obama will do all he can to destroy the Mexican Race. His supporters: Self-hating liberal whites that feel they owe something to blacks; and american negroes will demand Mexican Blood.
ROFL bet he felt like a dumb fuckin bastard wen obama won...
thats y his ass is banned
__________________
Maabin Down Beltline
Bangin June 27th
1 Deep
Picture me
there's some weird paranoid shit on these threads. Can't obama just be a corporate establishment candidate without him posing a threat to whites or latinos on a racial level? can't the man just be a flawed or an imperfect (or worse!) presidential choice without inciting some dumb screeds about black people and liberals? seriously. at this point everyone should understand that anyone who wishes to be president needs to earn the trust of the powerful in this nation. they're also immediately surrounded by people trying to sabotage them. they're also not tyrants and or often not in a position to even induce the drastic "change" people want and also fear. hell, the fact that Obama isn't up there making executive orders every day should be solace to all of us that he is playing his limited role as president which in many respects is a symbolic role.
you must feel so discouraged about the mexican race to say some shit like that.
If hitler couldnt wipe out the jews, what makes you think ANYONE can wipe out the Mexican race???
"We as Mexicans need to look out for our own racial interest."
Good point. But now days our raza is lookin' out only for them selves.
what? i did not know that latinos born in usa were mexicans. mexican race? when did my nationality become a race? i am a mexican by birth, and i am a latino by blood
what? i did not know that latinos born in usa were mexicans. mexican race? when did my nationality become a race? i am a mexican by birth, and i am a latino by blood
You probably also partake in Latin Culture as well. Latino by blood is a bit hard to describe since every group that has had a majority of it's people partake in Latin Culture tend to be described as "Latino" i.e. Italians, Spanish, Portuguese, Amerindians, etc. That is without even getting into all the ethnic groups that make up those populations. Amerindians has many different ethnic groups. Italians from Italy usually consider themselves a part of a particular region of Italy and not Italy itself(Lazio (Roman), Calabrian, Sicilian, Tuscan, Lombardy) mainly because of the different ethnic groups that inhabited the regions. Southern Italy used to be considered Greater Greece because it was colonized by the Greeks. Lazio(Rome) and Tuscany were colonized by immigrants from Anatolia/Troy(Turkey). Lombardy is mixed with the Germans. Sicily is mixed with the Normans and Arabs.
So like I said it is practically impossible to figure out what Latino genetics are.
It is probably easier to just consider yourself Latin based on cultural things and not genetic things.
We are not arrogant enough to believe we are all powerful and we are willing to learn and adapt. When we came to America we merged with the people and willingly adopted some of the beliefs of the people living their if the beliefs were the best thing for our combined people.
You probably also partake in Latin Culture as well. Latino by blood is a bit hard to describe since every group that has had a majority of it's people partake in Latin Culture tend to be described as "Latino" i.e. Italians, Spanish, Portuguese, Amerindians, etc. That is without even getting into all the ethnic groups that make up those populations. Amerindians has many different ethnic groups. Italians from Italy usually consider themselves a part of a particular region of Italy and not Italy itself(Lazio (Roman), Calabrian, Sicilian, Tuscan, Lombardy) mainly because of the different ethnic groups that inhabited the regions. Southern Italy used to be considered Greater Greece because it was colonized by the Greeks. Lazio(Rome) and Tuscany were colonized by immigrants from Anatolia/Troy(Turkey). Lombardy is mixed with the Germans. Sicily is mixed with the Normans and Arabs.
So like I said it is practically impossible to figure out what Latino genetics are.
It is probably easier to just consider yourself Latin based on cultural things and not genetic things.
Their is also a Latin Europe as well. Doesn't prove their is a genetic basis to Latinos though. It seems more cultural to me. Like if a Chinese guy moves to Latin America and still stays with his Chinese culture then he is Chinese but if he changes to Latin Culture then he is Latino.
We are not arrogant enough to believe we are all powerful and we are willing to learn and adapt. When we came to America we merged with the people and willingly adopted some of the beliefs of the people living their if the beliefs were the best thing for our combined people.
Their is also a Latin Europe as well. Doesn't prove their is a genetic basis to Latinos though. It seems more cultural to me. Like if a Chinese guy moves to Latin America and still stays with his Chinese culture then he is Chinese but if he changes to Latin Culture then he is Latino.
but he was not born in latin american nation, so he is still chinese by birth. like say, many people in usa say they are mexican if they born in usa, but few of my friends went to usa and they were mexican. THEY are mexican. if you really were a mexican, you would not run away to usa, like many traitors do .
there is no latin europe there is no latin america
how in the hell can you say latin europe when no one in europe speaks latin?????????? no one in america speaks latin expects for fuckin' catholic priests
get it through ya head, latin is a dead language
__________________
i am the first and the last, there is none before me or after me. all those who have lost their way will lose their lives. you've wasted ya breath and time on things that didn't matter. and that's why you've no future
Re: DON'T VOTE FOR NIGGER OBAMA.
Linear Mode
